Headed in the right direction
Assessment Tagged ISTE, NETS-T, standards, technology No Comments »This week the International Society for Technology in Education released a promising update to its National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS-T) framework. The new standards reflect a new way of thinking about technology’s role in 21st century education.
The previous NETS-T standards maintained a focus on teacher-driven textual knowledge. I am delighted to see that the updated NETS-T standards reflect a strong emphasis on the teacher as a co-learner and a knowledge facilitator. Rather than merely delivering content knowledge to students, teachers are now expected to guide their students through a creative learning process that involves collaboration, innovation, problem solving and authentic learning experiences. This is a significant step forward in re-defining the role of the teacher in 21st century society. NETS-T 2008 is now on the right track.
NETS-T 2008 consists of five major performance indicators:
- Learning and creativity
- Assessment
- Digital Age skills
- Digital citizenship
- Professional development
For more information on NETS-T 2008, I invite you to read Dave Nagel’s article The Future of Instruction: Teacher as ‘Co-Learner’ in The Journal.

Schools are beginning to utilize an excellent teaching resource when designing their technology professional development program … their students! And why not? Students are generally tech savvy and often know more about information and communication technology than their teachers. Most students I know would jump at the opportunity to turn the tables and share their expertise with their students.
I just read an article in Education Week that is sure to stir up controversy amongst educators. The article, entitled
I am happy to announce that I have accepted a teaching position this fall at
of learning rather than just the outcome. Evaluating the methods in which a student reaches an outcome should hold just as much importance as the outcome itself. As you can see, the content of instruction does not change, just the method of assessment. In this scenario, students still gain the content knowledge, but they also strengthen their own metacognitive skills. They learn how to think, not just recall information.