I just read a very interesting article in Edutopia entitled Reinventing the Big Test: The Challenge of Authentic Assessment by Grace Rubenstein. This article discusses the shortcomings of today’s high-stakes state proficiency tests. According to the article, “The educational assessment tests states use today have two fundamental flaws: They encourage the sort of mind-numbing drill-and-kill teaching educators (and students) despise, and, just as important, they don’t tell us much about the quality of student learning.”
I couldn’t agree more. Assuming the schools I currently work in are representative of the whole, teachers have lost control over how and what they teach. The stakes are so high for children to pass the Ohio Achievement Test that the teachers are under immense pressure to focus their fast-paced lessons entirely on test preparation. According to many teachers I talk to, this has significantly dumbed down their students. Children are losing their ability to think critically about real issues (the ones that exist outside of textbooks) and to apply creative solutions to everyday problems. As well-intentioned as the No Child Left Behind Act is, it is actually a major obstacle to the preparation of children for the demands of the 21st century workforce.
The article goes on to explore alternatives to standardized, multiple-choice, one-size-fits-all testing. Some test makers are actively working on more authentic forms of assessment that measure a student’s resourcefulness and problem-solving skills. These tests are more complex, more subjective and much more complicated to grade. This, of course, makes them expensive to administer.
I suppose in today’s environment of hyper-accountability, we will never see the end to standardized testing. We have gone too far. The tests are here to stay. The question is, how can we realistically improve or alter standardized assessment to reflect society’s need for accountability while also recognizing the need to prepare a generation of creative, problem-solving, critically thinking children?